Polyphony 5 Reading Period Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

HOME | CATALOG | DOWNLOADS | LINKS | EDITORIALS | DISCUSSION | CONTACT

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Log Out | Edit Profile | Register
Night Shade Message Boards » Polyphony » Polyphony 5 Reading Period « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Wednesday, August 25, 2004 - 08:29 am:   

POLYPHONY 5

Wheatland Press
P.O. Box 1818
Wilsonville, OR 97070

inquiries@wheatlandpress.com

Wheatland Press announces an open reading period for POLYPHONY 5, the fifth volume in the critically-acclaimed POLYPHONY anthology series. The publisher and editors are committed to finding outstanding cutting edge fiction from new writers as well as from established writers. We will be looking for stories that stretch (or break) the boundaries of traditional genres. Send us your magic realism, surrealism, literary stories with a genre sensibility, and other hard-to-classify stories with strong literary values, compelling characters, engaging tone and unique voice. If you really want to know what we are looking for, check out the previous volumes of POLYPHONY, available directly from Wheatland Press, genre booksellers or online booksellers.

We will accept submissions by lettermail only at our P.O. Box, postmarked from November 1st, 2004 through December 15th, 2004. Manuscripts received with a postmark date outside the designated submission period will be discarded unopened. Email submissions are welcome from overseas contributors. If you live in the United States and feel you must email a submission to us, please query first.

Please follow standard manuscript formatting and submission conventions, especially including no simultaneous or multiple submissions. Word count is open, but our preferred range is 4,000-10,000 words. If you are unfamiliar with standard manuscript formatting, please see the various essays and references under the heading "Manuscript Preparation" at:

http://www.sfwa.org/writing/

Some specifics based on prior experience.

1) No reprints. Not even if prior publication had limited or private distribution. If you feel you must submit a reprint, please query first. We'll still say "no," but it might make you feel better. Reprint submissions will be rejected unread.

2) Please use normal manuscript headers. Manuscripts without full author identification and contact information on the first page of the story will be rejected unread. This does not mean use a cover sheet, this means put your name and address in the upper left hand corner and the word count in the upper right hand corner, on the same page as the title and the first paragraph of the story. It also helps to put "by Your Name" under the title, just in case. As basic as this is, at least one story got rejected from the final reading round of a prior volume because it had become separated from its cover letter and we couldn't identify the author. Improperly identified manuscripts will be rejected unread.

3) Do not include copyrighted material in your story. Manuscripts which feature quotations from popular music or published authors will be rejected unread. It is difficult and expensive to clear rights for this sort of material, and the potential liabilities to both author and publisher are enormous. This is fiction. Make up your own material.

4) No multiple submissions. One story per author, please. If we want to see additional material from you, we will contact you. Multiple submissions from one author will be rejected unread. Please don't play games on this one, either.

5) By the same token, no simultaneous submissions. We won't hold your story for an unreasonable length of time, please allow us the privilege of being able to buy it.

6) If you are submitting by letter mail from overseas with a SASE, please supply AMERICAN stamps or a sufficient number of IRCs. Colorful as they are, foreign stamps are not accepted by the United States Postal Service. Enclosing cash for return postage is not helpful either, because that is another transaction we have to deal with. We will also be happy to reply by email to overseas subs, even those that come by letter mail.

It is our intention to respond to all submissions by the end of January 2005. We pay $0.06 per word for First Print and Electronic World Anthology Rights, to a maximum of $600.00, on acceptance, along with two author's copies on publication. These guidelines may be redistributed freely in their entirety.

We look forward to seeing your best work.

Deborah Layne, Publisher and Editor
Jay Lake, Editor
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Wednesday, August 25, 2004 - 08:34 am:   

Let me emphasize two things about the above guidelines...

We're not kidding about that upper word-count limit (no more than 10K words without express prior permission).

We're also not kidding about multiple submissions (one story per envelope, one envelope per author).

Thanks for your support.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Neil A
Posted on Tuesday, November 02, 2004 - 05:34 am:   

Hi, Deborah

A quick question for you.

>>We will also be happy to reply by email to overseas subs, even those that come by letter mail.<<

Does this mean that you accept email submissions from abroad? If so, how should these be sent?

Thanks.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Tuesday, November 02, 2004 - 06:26 am:   

That's correct, Neil. Email me (deborahlayne at wheatlandpress.com) for details.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Neil A
Posted on Friday, November 05, 2004 - 08:50 am:   

Hi, Deborah. Just wanted to check you got my email. I sent it just after you posted your reply.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Sunday, November 14, 2004 - 09:36 am:   

Well, folks, the Polyphony 5 submission period is in full swing and I'm posting this message here in an attempt to stop myself from hurling an insult at any particular individual writer who is stupid enough to say the following, or some variation on it, in a cover letter or query:

"Although I haven't see a copy, I've heard such positive things about the anthology that I am anxious to have my work considered..."

Here's some advice: Do not tell the (struggling) publisher/editor of an anthology series that you can't be bothered to buy a copy when you send in a submission.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob Urell
Posted on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 - 05:53 am:   

Dear Editor,
While I'd never waste my money on your product, I firmly believe that you will love my story about William Shatner's interpretive dance of Captain Kirk's struggle against his dark passion for Harry Potter. It's only 15,000 words long, so you won't mind stretching that silly word limit, since it will immediately become apparent to you that I am a serious artiste and as such am immune to such petty concerns. Also, please be aware that I have sent this story to four other publishers and will only sell it to the two who offer the highest bid on it, so you might want to pay me more than your standard 6 cents a word.
Thanks much!
xxooxxoo
Terry Goodkind
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 - 06:38 am:   

Dear Author,

If you can work in some trolls and unicorns, then bring it on.

Sincerely,

Editor
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob Urell
Posted on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 - 08:46 am:   

Putting something in the mail for you, Deb. I sure hope the plastic bag doesn't spring a leak....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob Urell
Posted on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 - 10:15 am:   

Shite. Never mind. Printer cartridge went tits up. Count yourself lucky, madame.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob Urell
Posted on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 - 10:19 am:   

Oh, wait. Fixed it. No clemency for you.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob Urell
Posted on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 - 10:21 am:   

Nope. Still broke.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Minz
Posted on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 - 10:31 am:   

The New, New, New Bob Urell Streamofconsciousness Blues . . .
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

NotaMonkey
Posted on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 - 01:27 pm:   

Dear Author,

If you can work in some trolls and unicorns, then bring it on.



Deborah - you might want to ask the Strange Horizons folk what happened the last time they made a comment like that. *cough* zombie unicorns up the wazoo *cough*
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 - 01:33 pm:   

Bob, for you, I'll relax the submission guidelines and accept a handwritten manuscript...preferably purple crayon.

Nota, here at Wheatland Tower, we fear no zombie unicorns...the old wazoo is guarded by specially designed Robo-Security(tm) Goblins.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob Urell
Posted on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 - 09:39 pm:   

Me and this printer go way back, Minz. It's getting to be a running joke. Well, for me anyways.
Goddamn Computer
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Minz
Posted on Wednesday, December 01, 2004 - 07:03 am:   

I hear ya, Bob. Better to laugh than to cry. Good luck with Ol' Reliable.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2004 - 06:52 am:   

Just a quick reminder that tomorrow is the last day to mail your Polyphony 5 submission.

And let me just point out that since it is a *postmark* deadline, there should be no need to use Fed Ex or Express Mail or any of that sort of thing. If it's postmarked December 15, then you've met the deadline and it matters not to me whether I see it on December 16 or December 31. Save your money.

And please do not send submissions certified or registered mail. This time of year I'd rather not stand in line at the post office.

Thanks for your support.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jason Erik Lundberg
Posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2004 - 08:46 am:   

I'm really going to try to get something to you, Deborah. Let's hope I make it in time.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2004 - 10:10 am:   

Cool. And, btw, I'm really looking forward to reading SCS...looks great!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

J. Erik Lundberg
Posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2004 - 12:06 pm:   

Thanks, Deborah!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Melissa Mead
Posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2004 - 02:48 pm:   

I sent one 12/7. I'm assuming it got there. :fingers crossed:
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Tuesday, December 14, 2004 - 11:37 pm:   

Yup. Saw it a few days ago. Thanks!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Melissa Mead
Posted on Wednesday, December 15, 2004 - 03:31 am:   

Whew! Thanks!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Alex Cohen
Posted on Tuesday, February 01, 2005 - 06:09 pm:   

How's the reading for Polyphony 5 going?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Alaya
Posted on Saturday, February 05, 2005 - 09:12 pm:   

Just out of curiosity, is the hear-back time still going to be around the 15th, or perhaps a bit later?

Thanks!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Sunday, February 06, 2005 - 08:07 am:   

Perhaps a bit later, but we are trying to get the first batch of rejections out by then.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Keenan
Posted on Tuesday, February 15, 2005 - 04:36 pm:   

So, the first batch of rejections went out today?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Tuesday, February 15, 2005 - 04:45 pm:   

Well, they went out of my house and into my car...they'll get to the post office soon. We've had a series of unfortuante events here at Wheatland Towers and that has slowed things down just a wee bit.

Our apologies. We know how anxious you all must be.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mikal Trimm
Posted on Thursday, February 17, 2005 - 04:03 pm:   

Hope things aren't too Lemony Snicket for you guys at the moment...

Best wishes for the end of whatever calamities are besetting you.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Wondering in Wichita
Posted on Sunday, February 20, 2005 - 09:48 am:   

So, a big batch of rejections obviously got sent out (I've seen quite a few reports of rejects on the Speculations Web site). How many stories are you still holding, Deborah? What's the ETA on the final TOC?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Monday, February 21, 2005 - 09:30 pm:   

I'd really rather not post numbers publicly. Just my preference.

Jay and I were both at RadCon this weekend, and we both have a number of stories to read or re-read. I think it's going to be several weeks before we make our final decisions.

I know how frustrating it is to wait for responses on submissions, but realize that both Jay and I are also parents; he has a day job and a writing career; I have lots of other responsibilities...we do the best we can.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Patient in Paducah
Posted on Tuesday, February 22, 2005 - 08:02 am:   

I wasn't dissing you for not being done, just trying to get an idea of where you're at. The update you've provided is perfect.

No more pestering (from this pest, at least).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hopeful
Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 09:59 am:   

Since the first batch of rejections went out a week ago today, is it OK if those of us who have not yet received same allow ourselves to feel moderately hopeful?

;-)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 10:18 am:   

Unless, of course, we lost your manuscript.

:-)

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hopeless
Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 10:40 am:   

ACCCKKKKK!!!! GASP!!! SPLUTTER!!!!

NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dawn B.
Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 10:43 am:   

You're evil Deborah. I like it. ;-)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 10:46 am:   

:-)



Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Evil-er One
Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 11:00 am:   

Actually, I think you should institute a rule that anyone who queries you via the messageboard is automatically rejected.

Evil-er One
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Pointing out the Obvious
Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 10:00 pm:   

Gee, Evil-ler One, why do you think so many people who are posting queries here are using pseudonyms??


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Evil-er One Yet Still Stupid
Posted on Saturday, February 26, 2005 - 06:32 am:   

Couldn't somebody be called Hopeless, Pointless? It could happen.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Already rejected and free to be a wise guy
Posted on Saturday, February 26, 2005 - 07:49 am:   

Sounds like a family of depressed Puritains.

"I am Hopeless Bother. This is Goody Bother, and these are our children: Despair, Pestillence, and Oh."
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Marie Brennan
Posted on Saturday, February 26, 2005 - 09:39 am:   

"Unless, of course, we lost your manuscript."

This is the bit that tends to drive me batty with doubt. If I submit somewhere and don't get a rejection when I expect one, the pessimist in me assumes that means, not that my story's doing well, but that the post office ate it.

The fact that I've occasionally been right about that doesn't help. Rassum-frassum.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Thou-Shalt-Not-Commit-Adultery-Nor-Lose-My-Manuscript Hopkins
Posted on Saturday, February 26, 2005 - 10:37 am:   

>Sounds like a family of depressed Puritains.

>"I am Hopeless Bother. This is Goody Bother, and >these are our children: Despair, Pestillence, >and Oh."

Post. Of. Teh. Millenium.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob Urell
Posted on Monday, February 28, 2005 - 11:14 am:   

Hey Deb,
You're welcome to just shoot me an e-mail when you reject mine. Oh, and we need to talk about that readings thing. Clark College might want to give us a venue....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Monday, February 28, 2005 - 11:25 am:   

Dear Bob the Optimist,

Okay. I'm swamped right now, but I'll keep it in mind.

Deborah


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Monday, February 28, 2005 - 11:27 am:   

Since I've had some queries, let me just add that I have not sent any rejections for any e-subs yet.

Again, I apologize for the delay and ask for your patience. I didn't expect to have my car totalled in the middle of slush reading.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Scott William Carter
Posted on Monday, February 28, 2005 - 11:35 am:   

Oh, damn, Deborah, really sorry to hear that. Hope everybody's okay.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Monday, February 28, 2005 - 11:49 am:   

Thanks, Scott. I was the only one in the car (no manuscripts) and I'm fine. It just added a level of hassle to life for a couple of weeks that most of us don't need, you know?



Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Melissa Mead
Posted on Monday, February 28, 2005 - 01:57 pm:   

Sorry to hear about the car, but I'm glad you didn't get hurt.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

M.K. Hobson
Posted on Monday, February 28, 2005 - 05:36 pm:   

Deborah, I find it darkly, sadly hilarious that you felt compelled to add that there were no MSS in the car.

"OMG ... Deborah totalled her car ... WAS MY MANUSCRIPT INSIDE???"

Perspective, people!

;-)

M
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Marie Brennan
Posted on Monday, February 28, 2005 - 10:22 pm:   

"No manuscripts or editors were harmed in the making of this anthology."

Glad to hear you're okay, Deborah.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Josh Rountree
Posted on Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - 06:59 am:   

Glad you're okay, Deborah.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

JV
Posted on Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - 07:09 am:   

Glad to hear you're okay, too!!

Best,

Evil-er

I mean, Jeff
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - 07:42 am:   

Thanks, all...like I said, it was more a hassle than anything life-threatening. How the accident occurred is kind of funny...

I was sitting in a line of about five cars at a school crosswalk when the offending car plowed into me and pushed me into the car in front of me. Why did he do this? It seems that seconds before, his little puppy (not being a dog-person, it looked like a black rat to me) had fallen off the car seat and he leaned over to pick it up and when he looked up again, well, there were all these cars stopped in front of him. The puppy was fine, although his insurance agent told me the puppy now refuses to get in the car.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

disillusionment's avatar
Posted on Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - 09:56 am:   

*sputter* Not a dog person?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob the Omnipest
Posted on Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - 01:01 pm:   

Oh, c'mon Deb, tell the truth.
Not about the accident, I mean, just in general. Cuz it's a good policy. Telling the truth. YOU telling the truth, that is. I avoid it. I creep people out when I tell them what I'm REALLY thinking.
Bedtime.
Hi Mary.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Marie Brennan
Posted on Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - 02:02 pm:   

It sounds like you got a scaled-down version of a Stephen King Accident. Puppy instead of Rottweiler, smashed car instead of smashed you. See? Dogs are trouble.


--Marie the Cat Person
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

M.K. Hobson
Posted on Tuesday, March 01, 2005 - 06:53 pm:   

Hi Bob!

(Assuming I'm the Mary you're saying hi to.)

M
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob Urell
Posted on Wednesday, March 02, 2005 - 02:18 am:   

Hi Mary,
You know it.
Didn't get to see you much at Lucius's reading. All the good stuff's good and all the bad stuff's trivial, I hope? We should do coffee, or falafel, as Deb calls it. I don't know why. She just does.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Wednesday, March 02, 2005 - 05:03 am:   

Yes, Marie...but I still might be able to turn this into a book on writing...I think I did get a glimpse of some kind of Truth in the moment of impact.

Bob, do I call it falafel? Well, let's get a cup, shall we? You are The Organizer.

:-)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

A Panther By Association
Posted on Wednesday, March 02, 2005 - 05:20 am:   

Up early, huh? Can't sleep?

Me neither....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bubbis Maximus
Posted on Wednesday, March 02, 2005 - 07:37 am:   

Hey Deb,
How's about next week? Don't know my schedule (that's shedule to you Brits) yet, but I could definitely go for a sit down at [Evil Corporate Purveyor of Burnt Coffee] in the near-future.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

M.K. Hobson
Posted on Wednesday, March 02, 2005 - 06:05 pm:   

Hey Bob:

I'm up for coffee or falafel as well. (What a popular man-about-town you are!) The week of March 21 looks good for me -- the week before that I'm travelling to NYC for a trade show.

Let me know what you think,

M
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Wednesday, March 02, 2005 - 06:59 pm:   

Oh, rats, my kid is on Spring Break the week of the 21st...but next week looks good for me, any day except Monday, that is.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

EricS
Posted on Friday, March 04, 2005 - 08:19 am:   

March 1: it looked like a black rat to me
March 2: Oh, rats...

If my reading of genre literature serves any predictive value in the real world, I am forced to conclude that you are being haunted by some witch's familiar and are slowly being driven out of your mind:-)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Friday, March 04, 2005 - 10:28 am:   

Slowly? Oh, no, no, no...I figure I've got an hour, maybe an hour and a half of lucidity left, then...well...look out!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob Urell
Posted on Saturday, March 05, 2005 - 06:38 am:   

Crap, Deb. Monday's the best day for me. Maybe I can do something on Friday? It'd have to be morning-ish, like before noon.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Saturday, March 05, 2005 - 08:52 am:   

I'll email you, Bob.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jonathan
Posted on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 - 03:43 pm:   

Hi Deb - Someone's probably already asked this, but any idea when P5 is likely to be an actual printed thingie? Only reason I ask is that I was indulging myself, re-reading part of P4 last night, and darn if it ain't a cool thing. The world could use an all-new Polyphony sometime soon, or at least those of us stuck in the arse-end of an Antipodean anti-climax sure could. - J
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Wednesday, March 16, 2005 - 06:08 am:   

Thank you, Jonathan!

Look for Polyphony 5 by the end of August. I expect we'll be posting a TOC here in a few weeks.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jonathan
Posted on Wednesday, March 16, 2005 - 04:05 pm:   

Woo hoo! Can't wait to see it, when the time comes. The last one was definitely a doozy.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bruce Chrumka
Posted on Sunday, August 07, 2005 - 09:02 pm:   

Hi Deborah,

Does that enigmatic Sally Carteret have a new story?

'Weapons of Mass Seduction' was terrific! Are you planning a follow-up? Please?

Cheers, Bruce
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Evelyn
Posted on Sunday, August 07, 2005 - 09:28 pm:   

When's the reading period for Polyphony 6, please?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Deborah
Posted on Monday, August 08, 2005 - 07:22 am:   

Bruce, Sally does have a story in Polyphony 5 titled "Nine Electric Flowers."

No plans to do a sequel to Weapons at this point, but I'm glad you enjoyed it.

Evelyn, the submission period will be something like December 1 through January 15 unless I go broke or losemy mind before that. Watch this space.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Log Out | Edit Profile | Register